Crowdsourcing is the Future of Performance Reviews

New Book: The HR Tech Field Guide is a quick and easy guide to selecting your HR Technology. Learn how to navigate this $15 billion industry. Click here to buy.

lunapic_137156489712109_3Purchase a copy of Eric Mosley’s The Crowdsourced Performance Review book on Amazon today! 

Are you happy with your performance review system? I thought not. Traditional performance reviews are desperately out of date. An annual review based on a manager rating performance on a scale of 1 to 5 according to a job description was designed for the workplace of 1973, not 2013.

Imagine a workplace in which employee performance reviews are as flexible and varied as today’s jobs must be.  What if the review were an objective, accurate and detailed narrative of each person’s work achievements?

Now imagine that it is the employees themselves who create that narrative and celebrate each instance of good performance; the inspirations and extra effort, creativity and determination that distinguish a high-performing employee. Over time, the system would aggregate thousands of those moments across the workforce. HR professionals and executives could then understand exactly which behaviors led to higher profits, customer delight, or nonprofit missions fulfilled.  Instead of a stack of 1-to-5 ratings, performance reviews would unlock the secrets of full productivity.

It can be done, and it will be done more and more as HR and executives get serious about fixing performance reviews. The way to achieve this is to combine the burgeoning popularity of crowdsourcing with today’s social technologies.

Why crowdsourcing?

The term “crowdsourcing” might be relatively new, but the social mechanisms that define it are as old as capitalism itself. In essence, crowdsourcing proposes that that a marketplace assigns value to work, whether that’s expressed in goods or services. Here’s why the “crowd” called your workforce should assess the relative value of individuals e.g. performance.

Crowdsourcing is accurate

Decades of research such as that detailed in James Surowiecki’s The Wisdom of Crowds confirms that many people deciding together make more accurate assessments over time than one person acting alone.

Crowdsourcing is trusted

Over time, people have learned to rely on crowdsourced assessment systems. This is why crowdsourced “star ratings” on Amazon.com, eBay and the iTunes store work — customers know that if many people like the product, chances are they will too.

Crowdsourcing supplements expertise with genuine experience

Why have Zagat, Yelp and TripAdvisor supplanted so many professional critics? Consumers have learned that the opinion of the crowd in so many situations is more reliable than the opinion of one person. In the case of employee performance reviews, crowdsourcing means many people, not just one manager, have assessed an individual’s performance

Crowdsourcing is effective in business

Similarly, B2B companies crave “likes” on their Facebook pages and top rankings from users in online forums. When you answer a questionnaire from a business research company ranking B2B services in HR, you’re participating in crowdsourcing.

With all these attributes, crowdsourcing is the performance review method of the future. What has been missing until now is a technology platform and a set of rules to combine the thoroughness of performance reviews with the wisdom of crowds.

Social recognition is the platform

Social recognition combines a technological platform and set of rules by which employees rate each other’s performance in a constructive and nuanced way.

Social recognition combines ranking with narrative, just like the traditional performance review. With real-time, authentic feedback from employees’ peers, it creates a detailed yet unbiased view into who and what is driving your business.

Where does this leave the manager? In the performance review of the future, the manager will still be accountable for group performance. The performance narrative provided by social recognition doesn’t diminish the manger’s authority. On the contrary, it empowers the competent manager to celebrate achievement and spot problems early (which a lack of recognition can often show).  Because social recognition is inherently positive, the manager is still responsible to “praise in public, criticize in private.”

As a database of crowdsourced performance feedback grows, analytical software will reveal hidden social dynamics in the organization. Executives will identify quiet but influential individuals, those who I call “hidden influencers,” and groom them for more formal leadership.  HR can reward creativity and engagement with higher pay and better opportunity. High-potential employees can be targeted early to mitigate flight risk.

The wisdom of crowds is already revolutionizing consumer and B2B decision-making. Now is the time for HR and other leaders will bring the wisdom of the employee “crowd” to the crowd itself by adding social recognition to performance reviews.

Purchase a copy of Eric Mosley’s The Crowdsourced Performance Review book on Amazon today! 

Photo Credit.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Comments

  1. Crowdsourced unbiased? I believe this is unrealistic. Peer input is of great value and these conversations inform what is taking place under the radar and help us understand our employees better, but any kind of rating system will bring in bias, popularity and self-interests.

    Also, what kind of social recognition platform are we talking about? The technology matters. Not all tech will stick, not everyone will use it, this affects the ability to accurately crowdsource. Just like in life, there will still be “quiet” ones who aren’t participating. These are tools and nothing takes the place of human touch, aka the manager’s participation and active engagement.

    Reply
  2. Hmm is anyone else having problems with the
    images on this blog loading? I’m trying to determine if its a problem on my end or if it’s the blog.
    Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

    Reply
  3. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.
    You definitely know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could be
    giving us something informative to read?

    Reply
  4. I was wondering if you ever thought of changing the structure of your site?
    Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.

    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two
    images. Maybe you could space it out better?

    Reply
  5. Adult students can be classified by age demographics to be
    at least two years older than most students for their current educational level.

    We must not take for granted that we have the chance to decide what
    we want in life, who we want to become and where and how we want to spend every
    day of our lives. With the availability of streaming videos, these demonstrations may be viewed time and again, making it the
    perfect learning tool to foster an adult learner’s interest.

    Reply
  6. Unless your grandchildren are in imminent danger, you have no right
    to interfere. An individual who wants to head to a retirement community in Long
    Island ought to realize that this transfer also requires
    a spending budget. The ADD adult might have trouble with
    staying on task, staying organized and procrastinating, just as the Attention
    Deficit Disorder child does.

    Reply
  7. It finds all the classes of people inclusive the people that
    share its ideology and the thoughts. Antibiotics, for instance, do improve acne conditions, but
    they also interfere with the balance of healthy intestinal flora, making the problem
    cyclic. Non-traditional students fit into an array of categories.

    Reply
  8. “Steamy buns – I think I own that video” – before eating a
    steaming hot Chinese bun called “pau” (1). While
    being accepted by your peers may feel important at the
    moment, it is important to keep in mind that you may need to
    live with a disease that you will have for the rest of
    your life due to the decisions you make. The prevailing theory is that they are somehow caused
    by stress related to an abnormal response from the immune system.
    The problem is that some of these scandals are so stupid you almost
    cannot believe how stupid the person was.

    Reply

Leave a Comment